case law on doctrine of ultra vires No Further a Mystery
case law on doctrine of ultra vires No Further a Mystery
Blog Article
nine . Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The law enjoins the police to be scrupulously fair on the offender along with the Magistracy is to be certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court along with from other courts Nonetheless they have didn't have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The plenty of this power casts an obligation about the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for just a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.
Case regulation is specific towards the jurisdiction in which it had been rendered. For instance, a ruling inside a California appellate court would not generally be used in deciding a case in Oklahoma.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is really a free and democratic place, and once a person becomes a major he / she can marry whosoever he/she likes; If your parents of your boy or Female tend not to approve of this kind of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they are able to do if they can Slash off social relations with the son or the daughter, Nonetheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes such inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Woman who is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or guy who is a major, the couple is neither harassed by anyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who offers this sort of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to undertaking by instituting criminal proceedings with the police against this kind of persons and further stern action is taken against this kind of person(s) as provided by law.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy on the information contained on this site, or the information linked to on the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can make inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This is because transfer orders are typically considered within the administrative discretion on the employer. However, there may be exceptions in cases where the transfer is determined by malice, personal vendetta, or discrimination against the employee, they may have grounds to challenge before the suitable forum. Read more
Though there isn't any prohibition against referring to case regulation from a state other than the state in which the case is being read, it holds very little sway. Still, if there is no precedent in the home state, relevant case legislation from another state may be considered because of the court.
When the state court hearing the case reviews the legislation, he finds that, while it mentions large multi-tenant properties in a few context, it's actually really imprecise about whether the 90-working day provision relates to all landlords. The judge, based within the specific circumstances of Stacy’s case, decides that all landlords are held to the 90-working day notice need, and rules in Stacy’s favor.
eleven . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this is really a free and democratic nation, and once a person becomes a major she or he can marry whosoever he/she likes; In case the parents with the boy or Woman will not approve of this sort of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the utmost they will do if they will cut off social relations with the son or even the daughter, Nevertheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these types of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Female who is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or guy that's a major, the few is neither harassed by any one nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who gives these threats or harasses or commits acts of violence possibly himself or at his instigation, is taken to endeavor by instituting criminal proceedings by the police against these persons and further stern action is taken against these person(s) as provided by regulation.
10. Without touching the merits from the case in the issue of yearly increases within the pensionary emoluments with the petitioner, in terms of policy decision in the provincial government, this kind of annual increase, if permissible while in the case of employees of KMC, requires further assessment for being made by the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance on account of funding issues and not enough adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, demanding the petitioner to go after other legal avenues. Read more
Binding Precedent – A rule or principle founded by a court, which other courts are obligated to observe.
For that reason, this petition get more info is hereby disposed of during the terms stated above. However no harassment shall be caused to either party as well as the case shall be decided from the competent court of regulation if pending. Read more
10. Based over the findings from the inquiry committee, this petition just isn't regarded as maintainable and it is therefore liable to get dismissed, which is dismissed accordingly with pending application(s) if any. Read more
Where there are several members of a court deciding a case, there might be a person or more judgments supplied (or reported). Only the reason for your decision of your majority can constitute a binding precedent, but all may be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning can be adopted in an argument.
Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” are not binding, but could be used as persuasive authority, which is to provide substance for the party’s argument, or to guide the present court.